Complaint filed against Justice D. Y. Chandrachud for offences of forgery, Contempt and serious criminal offences under IPC. President of ‘Supreme Court & High Court Litigant Association (SCHCLA)’ filed complaint on affidavit.

•  The Complainant accused Justice D.Y. Chandrachud of passing unlawful orders where he is disqualified due to his son’s appearance in the case.
• The complainant sought prosecution of Justice Chandrachud, his son Adv. Abhinav Chandrachud under section 52, 109, 115, 166, 167, 201, 202, 218, 219, 302, 304, 304(A), 409,120(B), 34 of IPC.
• Complainant also sought action under section 2(b)(c), 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 129, 142 of the Constitution of India.
• Complainant also accused Justice Chandrachud in misusing Supreme Court machinery to pass an order by committing forgery to favor his son’s client in a bogus petition which was filed to commit extortion.
• Thousands of citizen wrote letter to CJI Uday Lalit to not to recommend Justice Chandrachud as next CJI.
• Apart from above, the complainant alleges that Justice Chandrachud had acted in connivance and conspiracy with vaccine companies and pharma mafia. And in order to give wrongful profit of thousands of crores to vaccine companies Justice Chandrachud acted against the binding precedents and passed unlawful orders and remarks in the Court hearing. Due to act of commission and omission on the part of Justice Chandrachud, the fundamental rights of crores of citizen are violated and life of many was put to danger.
• The later judgment passed by the Bench of Justice L. Nageshwar Rao in Jacob Puliyel’s case 2022 SCC Online SC 533 has exposed illegality and malafides of Justice D.Y.Chandrachud.

New Delhi:-  A complaint on the affidavit is filed before the Hon’ble President of India against Justice D.Y. Chandrachud for his criminal prosecution under sections 2(b) (c), 12 of  Contempt of Court, and also under sections 52, 109, 115, 166, 167, 201, 202, 218, 219, 302, 304, 304(A), 409,120(B), 34 of IPC.

1. The prayers in the said complaint reads thus;

“i) Direction to appropriate authority and CBI to complete the formality of consultation with Hon’ble Chief Justice of India (CJI) as per the law laid down in the case of K. Veeraswami Vs. Union of India (1991) 3 SCC 655, and register an F.I.R. against accused Judge Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and others :-

(a) under Section 52, 109, 385, 409, 218, 219, 166, 385, 192, 193, 511, 120 (B), 34, Etc. of Indian Penal Code  for corruption and misusing the machinery of Supreme Court and public property and passing an extremely bogus order in to help his son’s client even if he was disqualified to hear the case but he took the matter to himself and passed an unlawful order in a non existent issue with ulterior motive to facilitate the extortion in a multi crore scam;

(b)  under Section 52, 115, 302, 109, 304-A, 304, 409, 218, 219, 166, 201, 341, 342, 323, 336, 192, 193, 120 (B), 34, Etc. of Indian Penal Code for their various acts of corruption, misuse of power as a Supreme Court Judge for giving wrongful profits of thousands of crores to vaccine companies causing wrongful loss of public money and abating, promoting, facilitating the offences of murders and other injuries causing lifetime disability to Lacs of people with full knowledge of his unlawful acts.

ii) Directions to appropriate authority to file a contempt petition in the Supreme Court as per law and ratio laid down in Re: C.S. Karnan (20170 1 SCC 1, against Justice Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud and others for their willful disregard and defiance of the binding precedents of Hon’ble Supreme Court.

iii) Directions to Directorate of Enforcement(E.D.), Income Tax Department, Central Vigilance Commission, Intelligence Bureau, and all other agencies to investigate the links and commercial transactions of the accused with anti-national elements like Bill Gates, George Soros, and others who by their systematic and well-orchestrated conspiracy are involved in damaging the progress and wealth of the country with a further plan to commit mass murders (Genocide) and make people sicker and ultimately to make them slaves;

iv) OR IN ALTERNATIVE: -

To grant sanction and permission to the complainant to prosecute accused Judges Shri D.Y. Chandrachud  and others for the offences disclosed in the present complaint or may be disclosed on the basis of further evidences disclosed;

v) Direction to appropriate authorities to make a request to the Hon’ble Chief Justice of India to exercise the powers as per ‘In-House-Procedure’ as laid down in the case of Additional District and Sessions Judge ‘X’ Vs. Registrar General (2015) 4 SCC 91, and to forthwith withdraw the judicial works assigned to accused Judges and forward a reference of impeachment to dismiss the accused Judges;

vi) Direction to authorities of the department of law & justice the of Union of India to complete the formalities of sanction within three months as per the time limit given in the case of Vineet Narain Vs. Union of India (1998) 1 SCC 226 and Subramanian Swamy Vs. Arun Shourie (2014) 12 SCC 344;

vii) Appropriate consultation and request to Hon’ble Chief Justice of India to ask accused Judges to resign from their post as per ‘In-House-Procedure’ and as per the directions given and law laid by the Constitution Bench in the case of K. Veeraswami Vs. Union of India (1991) 3 SCC 655;

viii) Appropriate representation and request to Hon’ble Chief Justice of India to not to recommend the name of Justice D.Y. Chandrachud for the post of Chief Justice of India.”

1.1. The Prayers in the letter addressed to CJI Shri. Uday Lalitji Reads thus;

(i) Request to go through the proofs and not to recommend the name of Shri Justice Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud as a next Chief Justice of India as :

(a) his serious criminal offences of corruption, forgery, contempt, anti-national activities, misuse of Supreme Court machinery and public money for unauthorized purpose and to help his son, by passing an extremely bogus order to help his son’s client even if he was disqualified to hear the case, but he took the matter to himself and passed an unlawful order in a non existent issue with ulterior motive to facilitate the extortion in a multi crore scam and nexus with pharma and vaccine mafia is ex-facie proved from the record and complaint on affidavit filed by Sh. R.K. Pathan, President of ‘Supreme Court & High Court Litigants Association of India’.

(b) And, already deemed sanction is accorded by Hon’ble President of India under section 52, 109, 115, 166, 167, 201, 202, 218, 219, 302, 304, 304(A), 409,120(B), 34 of IPC in Case No. PRSEC/E/2022/04661 against Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice (Retd.) N.V. Ramanna & Ors.

(ii) Immediate direction to registry to seize the record of the SLP (Cri.) No. 9131 of 2021 filed by Anita Chavan where Justice Chandrachud committed forgery, Contempt and fraud on power to help his son’s client and where Justice Chandrachud was disqualified to hear the case;

(iii) Immediate exercise of power as per ‘In-House-Procedure’ as ruled in Additional District and Sessions Judge 'X' Vs. Registrar General, High Court of Madhya Pradesh (2015)4 SCC 91 and to immediately withdraw all judicial work assigned to him and request him to resign from the post of Judge as per direction and law laid down by the Constitution Bench Judgment in K. Veeraswami  Vs.Union Of India (1991) 3 SCC 655;

Further, if Justice D. Y. Chandrachud refuses to resign, then to forward a reference to Rajya Sabha for impeachment proceeding as per ‘In-House-Procedure’ ruled in (2015)4 SCC 91(Supra);

(iv) To, call for enquiry report from CBI/IB and on the basis of enquiry report direct Secretary General of the Supreme Court as per section 340 r/w 195 of Cr.P.C. to register case under section 166, 191, 192, 193, 199, 200, 219, 218, 409, 466, 471, 474, 120(B), 109, 34, 52 etc. of IPC against Justice D.Y. Chandrachud and Others, as per the law and ratio laid down in ABCD Vs. Union of India (2020) 2 SCC 52, K. Rama Reddy Vs State 1998 (3) ALD 305, Govind Mehta Vs. State Of Bihar (1971) 3 SCC 329, Dr. Sarvapalli Radhakrishnan Vs. Union of India 2019 SCC OnLine SC 51;

(v)  To initiate suo moto civil & criminal Contempt proceedings against Justice D.Y. Chandrachud for his wilful disregard and deliberate defiance of binding precedents of the Supreme Court and misusing the process of the Supreme Court for unlawful and for unauthorized purposes with the ulterior motive to help the extortionist who is his son’s client and also to help the pharma mafias and thereby  polluting the pure fountain of the administration Justice and undermining the majesty and dignity of the Supreme Court;

(vi)  Immediate direction to Supreme Court registry to not to place any matter related with a covid pandemic, vaccines, pharma companies, Bill Gates or any matters directly or indirectly connected with the issues,  before the bench where Justice D. Y. Chandrachud is a member and to withdraw all the matters assigned to him;

(vii) Further appropriate directions to Justice D. Y. Chandrachud to recuse from the cases where this type of issue are involved and the complainant, his advocates, and his witnesses members of Awaken India Movement, Indian Bar Association et al are appearing in the matter;

(viii) OR, taking action against the complainant if his complaint is false;”

1.2.  In similar cases the accused Judges of the Constitutional Court are earlier arrested, charge-sheeted dismissed from the Job and in the interim period, their judicial work is withdrawn by the CJI. Details are available on the website of the Indian Bar Association (IBA)

Link: https://indianbarassociation.in/

The grievance of the complainant in detail can be read by downloading the complaint. Click here

You can also download the representation dated 6th October2022 addressed to Hon'ble Chief Justice of India Shri Uday Lalitji. Click here