[Bill Gates & Adar Poonawalla’s Game Over] Bombay High Court took cognizance & issued notice in a vaccine murder case of Dr. Snehal Lunawat where interim compensation of Rs. 1000 Crore is sought.
- Advocate for Bill Gates appeared before the High Court and accepted the notice from High Court.
- Central Government gave enquiry report certificate that the death of Dr. Snehal Lunawat was due to side effects of covishield vaccine
- Petition also prays for action against social media like Facebook, YouTube, Google and main stream media who are running false narrative & conspiracy theories that vaccines are completely safe and suppressing the news and information regarding side effects, inefficacy or failure of vaccines.
- Notice is also issued to Dr. V. G. Somani Drug Controller General of India and Dr. Randeep Guleria former Director AIIMS who were running the false narratives that vaccines are completely safe.
- Supreme Court also issued notice to Central Government in vaccine deaths of two children from Hyderabad & Tamilnadu.
- Kerala High Court also asked Central Government to file reply affidavit in vaccine death of Nova Sabu & other people.
- Central Government informed the High Court that they are formulating guidelines for giving compensation to victims of vaccine side effects & also deaths.
.jpg)
Mumbai: -
1) Division Bench of Bombay High
Court Comprising Justice Gangapurwala & Madhav Jamdar had on 26.08.2022 took cognizance of the
petition filed by Shri Dilip Lunawat who is father of deceased Dr. Snehal
Lunawat, who died due to side effects of covishield vaccine. [Writ Petition No. 5767 of 2022 Dilip
Lunawat Vs. Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.]
Copy of petition
available at link:-
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11oiYAbwIcTPe_0J2zAUynVEipggrM14O/view?usp=sharing
Copy of order dated
26.08.2022 is available at link:
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/my-drive
2)
The Respondents in the petition are:
(i) Serum Institutes CEO Adar Poonawalla (Respondent No. 1)
(ii) Bill Gates Partner in covishield
vaccine (Respondent No. 2)
(iii)
Union of India (Respondent No. 3)
(iv)
State of Maharashtra (Respondent No. 4)
(v)
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (Respondent No. 5)
(vi)
Drug Controller General of India (Respondent No. 6)
(vii)
Dr. V.G. Somani, Drug Controller
General (Respondent No. 7)
(viii) Dr.
Randeep Guleria, Director of AIIMS (Respondent No. 8)
3)
The prayers in the petition reads thus;
“27.
PRAYERS:-
The Petitioner therefore
prays that, this Hon’ble Court may pleased to:
i)
To hold that, the petitioner’s daughter
was given vaccine under deception, and false narratives by the state
authorities that the vaccines are completely safe and if any serious or severe
side effects occurs then the state authorities have define treatment, however
when she suffered serious side effects then there was no treatment available
and lastly she died due to side effects of vaccines as has been confirmed by
the Government of India’s AEFI Committee, therefore state authorities are
responsible for causing her death by spreading false narratives and therefore,
they are bound to compensate the petitioner in view of law laid by Hon’ble
Supreme Court and Hon’ble High Courts and more particularly in the case of Registrar General, High Court of
Meghalaya Vs. State of Meghalaya 2021 SCC OnLine Megh 130;
ii)
To hold that the respondent state
authorities are having callous criminal attitude as till date they have not
changed their frequently asked questions and even on 15.12.2021 they are continuing their false narratives that they are
having definite treatment for any side effects of vaccines;
iii)
To
hold that as per law laid down by the Constitution Bench of Hon’ble Supreme
Court in Anita Khushwha’s case (2016) 8 SCC 509, the value of life of Indian citizen is not less than
that of any person across the world either of America or of any country and
therefore the Petitioner is entitled to the compensation in proportion to the compensation
granted in other similar cases in United State, Singapore etc.
iv)
To hold that, in view of factual and
legal position mentioned in the petition, the petitioner is entitled for an
interim compensation of Rs. 1000 Crores as a deterrence to guilty and as succor
to petitioner’s family for loss of life of petitioner’s daughter due to
deliberate act of commission and omission on the part of respondents, with a
liberty to the state authorities to recover it from the responsible officials
and Serum Institute, Pune who is the
manufacturer of Covishield Vaccine, as
per law & ratio laid down in Veena Sippy Vs. Mr. Narayan Dumbre & Ors.
2012 SCC OnLine Bom 339;
v)
Direct appropriate action by the
Respondent No. 3 Union of India against all including main stream and social
media like Google, YouTube, facebook etc. who are involved in the conspiracy of
suppressing the correct data about death causing and other serious vaccine
injuries and spreading false, misleading and one sided data to deprive
the citizen to take informed decision and compel them to take
vaccines;
vi)
Direct
the state authorities to take proper steps to stop further deaths of citizen
and to publish the side effects of vaccines by following the rules of Universal Declaration on Bioethics & Human Rights,
200 and as per law laid down in Master
Haridan Kumar Vs. UOI 2019 SCC online Del 11929
and
also as recently done by the Government of Japan;
vii)
Declare
that, the Petitioner’s daughter Dr. Snehal Lunawat and other doctors as a
Martyr who were given Covid vaccines through deception and coercion and who
died due to side effects of vaccines.
viii) Open a dedicated research
institute in India under the name of Dr. Snehal Lunawat.
ix) Pass any other order which this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and
proper in the fact and circumstances of the case.”
4)
When matter came up for hearing, the Counsel for petitioner, Adv. Nilesh Ojha, pointed
out the Court about the developments after filling of petition that the Central
Government admitted for providing compensation.
5)
The High Court find the petition worth consideration and ordered issuance of
notice.
The
Orders dated 26.08.2022 reads thus;
“1. Issue notice
to the Respondents, returnable on 17th November 2022. Hamdast allowed.
2. AGP accepts notice for Respondent No.4. The learned
Counsel accepts notice for Respondent No.2.”
6)
Lunawat stated in his plea that health workers like his daughter were compelled
to get vaccine due to the false narratives created by Drug Controller General
of India (DCGI) and Director of All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS)
that vaccines are safe, a narrative which was supplemented by State authorities
without verification.
He
stated his daughter took the vaccine on January 28, 2021 and due to the side
effects of those vaccines, she passed away on March 1, 2021.
Pertinently,
Lunawat contended that the Central government's AEFI committee on October 2,
2021 admitted that the death of his daughter was due to side effects of
Covishield vaccine.
"This petition is being filed to give justice to
my daughter and in order to save the life of many more people which are likely
to be murdered due to such unlawful activities of Respondent authorities,"
the plea stated.
7)
In a similar case of vaccine murder of two children, Supreme Court on 29.08.2022 took serious cognizance and
issued notice to Central Government. [Writ
Petition (Civil) No. 1220 of 2021, Rachna Gangu Vs. Union of India]
Copy of order:
- https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ekjpEJAWyyiJ6usY3qTFv1-Frgk87glc/view?usp=sharing)
8) In another case of vaccine
death of a school girl Nova Sabu, the Kerala High Court also took the
cognizance and asked central Government to file reply.
9) On 10.08.2022 Kerala
High Court in the case of Sayeeda Vs
Union of India in WP (C) No. 17628 of 2022 has issued directions to the
Central Government to immediately formulate guidelines for giving compensation
to the victims of deaths or other side effects of vaccines.
Order Link:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1APHixFHhQTGXwzc29CS2g5V7y1Z_-IUH/view?usp=sharing
Link of News
published in Bar & Bench:
10) On 10th August 2022, the central government submitted before Kerala High Court that they are formulating policies to provide monetary compensation to victims of vaccine side effects.
The matter came before Kerala High Court. The
Court observed;
“This is a national
calamity which we faced. Of course, I do understand the case is very genuine
and it has to be dealt with. As far as the Central government is concerned,
similar issues are cropping up in other states also. There has to be an effort
to formulate a proper guideline, a proper scheme for compensating these persons
and that is being done. Let them bring on record what steps have been taken so
that I can pass a reasoned and considered order, rather than an order in
vacuum. It is not a laughing matter, I consider it to be very serious", he orally
observed.”
The Court acknowledged
the seriousness of the petitioners' submission that the process has to be
hastened since the family members of the victims are facing extreme
difficulties consequent to the death of the earning member of the family.
"I find the
apprehension expressed by the learned counsel to be well founded. The situation
requires urgent action on the part of the National Disaster Management
Authority", the Court said in its order.”.
11) Due to deaths covishield -Astrazeneca, around 18 European Countries
banned said vaccines.
12) The first petition was filed before Bombay High court by Smt.
Kiran Yadav for claiming compensation of Rs. 100 crores for death of her son
Hitesh Kadve. She also sought criminal prosecution of Bill Gates & others.
This case was discussed across the world due to side effects of covishield. (Smt. Kiran Yadav vs. The State of Maharashtra
& Ors. Cri. WP No. 6159 of 2021)
13) Summary of worldwide cases of compensation to victims of Corona
Vaccine side effects:-
13.1. Source: Biotech express Magazine
Compensation suit are not only restricted to India, in Taiwan, a
panel of experts appointed by the Ministry of Health and Welfare agreed that
the government should pay NT$6 million (US$209,025) in the case of a woman,
whose deathis the first to be classified as directly related to receiving a
COVID-19 vaccine shot in Taiwan. Because the woman did not have any chronic
ailments, nor other conditions that could explain a very rare blood-clotting
disorder called “thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome,” a known side
effect of the AstraZeneca vaccine she received, the panel determined that her
death was linked to the vaccine, Chuang said. The woman was a Taipei resident
in her 50s, who was identified only by her surname Yu. She died of a brain
haemorrhage, a complication caused by the syndrome, according to the panel’s
findings. (https://focustaiwan.tw/society/202203290026
13.2. As per data with
Australian government, 37.8 million vaccine doses had been administered till
November 7, 2021 and 78,880 adverse events linked to vaccination were recorded.
A portal was being made to enable people to claim damages. At least 10,000
people have registered interest to make a claim, till the report came on news
portal. (https://www.wionews.com/world/thousands-of-australians-want-compensation-for-covid-vaccine-side-effects-report-429883).
13.3. In UK, Up to 920
compensation applications have been filed by people who were left seriously
injured after getting the Covid-19 vaccine as claims could hit £110million. Vikki Spit, from
Alston, Cumbria, hopes to qualify for financial support after her fiancé Zion,
48, died of a brain haemorrhage two weeks after getting the AstraZeneca vaccine
in May 2021. She claimed his death certificate named the AstraZeneca vaccine
but said she has been left in ‘limbo’ after applying for the scheme in June.
(https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10556213/Covid-vaccine-claims-hit-110m-920-compensation-applications-filed.html)
13.4. So, the compensation mechanism exist in most
developed countries and many of the vaccine adverse events injuries have been
compensated appropriately.
14)
Additional Data:
14.1. Singapore
In a recent case of vaccine injury the
Government of Singapore granted a compensation of Rs. 1 Crore 78 Las to the
victim as vaccine cause increase in heart beats.
Link: https://greatgameindia.com/pfizer-heart-attack-compensation/
14.2.
Thailand – Bangkok Post
Thailand Government
till now gave Rs. 1.71 Billion (around 400 Crores) to 14,034 people as a
compensation for side effects of Corona Vaccine. In them 3670 people were
compensated for death due to
Covid-19 vaccine.
Link: https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2292514/b1-7bn-for- adverse-jab-effects
14.3. United States – America:-
In a case of side effects of vaccines, the United States Government has set up the ‘National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program’. In a case of side effects of MMR vaccines the court granted a settlement of 101 Million U.S Dollars (7,50,34,31,400 Crores).
Link: https://www.mctlaw.com/101-million-dollar-vaccine-injury-mmr/
14.4.The companies failure to report certain safety data was also taken into consideration.
The investigating agency of US at their own investigated and recovered an amount 10.2
Billion U.S. around 7,57,71,92,40,000 Crore Rupees. The excerpts from the news published
on July 2, 2012 in The United State’ Department of Justice.
15. GLAXOSMITHKLINE TO PLEAD GUILTY AND PAY $3
BILLION TO RESOLVE FRAUD ALLEGATIONS AND FAILURE TO REPORT SAFETY DATA
Link: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/glaxosmithkline-plead-guilty-and-pay-3- billion-resolve-fraud-allegations-and-failure-report
15.1. Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in U.S. History
“1. The
United States alleges that GSK stated that Avandia had a positive cholesterol profile despite having no
well-controlled studies to
support that message. The United States also alleges that the company sponsored programs suggesting cardiovascular benefits
from Avandia therapy despite warnings on the FDA- approved label regarding cardiovascular risks. GSK has
agreed to pay $657 million relating to
false claims arising from misrepresentations about Avandia. The federal share of this settlement is $508 million and the state share is $149 million.
2. In addition to the
criminal and civil resolutions, GSK has executed
a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA) with the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). The plea agreement and CIA include novel provisions that
require that GSK implement and/or maintain
major changes to the way it does business, including changing the way its sales force is compensated to remove compensation based on sales goals for
territories, one of the driving
forces behind much of the conduct at issue in this matter. Under the CIA, GSK is required to change its executive compensation program to permit the
company to recoup annual bonuses and long-term incentives from covered executives if they, or their subordinates, engage in significant misconduct. GSK may recoup
monies from executives who are current employees and those who have left the company. Among other things, the CIA also requires GSK to implement and
maintain transparency in its research
practices and publication policies and to follow specified policies in its contracts with various health care payors.
Federal employees
deserve health care providers and suppliers,including drug manufacturers, that
meet the highest standards of ethical
and professional behavior,” said Patrick E. McFarland, Inspector General of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Assistant Director of
the FBI’s Criminal, Cyber, Response and Services
Branch. “Together, we will continue to bring to justice those engaged in illegal schemes that threaten the safety of prescription drugs and other
critical elements of our nation’s healthcare system.
This matter was
investigated by agents from the HHS-OIG; the FDA’s
Office of Criminal Investigations; the Defense Criminal Investigative Service of the Department of Defense; the Office of the Inspector
General for the Office of Personnel Management; the Department of Veterans Affairs; the Department of
Labor; TRICARE Program Integrity;
the Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Postal Service and the FBI.
This resolution is part of the government’s emphasis on combating health care fraud and another step for the Health Care Fraud Prevention and Enforcement Action Team (HEAT) initiative, which was announced in May 2009 by Attorney General Eric Holder and Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of HHS. The partnership between the two
departments has focused effortsto reduce and prevent Medicare and Medicaid financial fraud through
enhanced cooperation. Over the last three years, the department has recovered a total of more than $10.2 billion
in settlements, judgments,
fines, restitution, and forfeiture in health care
fraud matters pursued under the False Claims Act and the Food, Drug and Cosmetic
Act.
The company’s unlawful promotion of certain prescription drugs, its failure to report certain safety data, and its civil liability for alleged false price reporting
practices.
GSK
did not make available data from two other studies in which Paxil also failed
to demonstrate efficacy in treating depression in patients under 18. The United
States further alleges that GSK sponsored dinner programs, lunch programs, spa
programs and similar activities to promote the use of Paxil in children and
adolescents. GSK paid a speaker to talk to an audience of doctors and paid for
the meal or spa treatment for the doctors who attended.
Between
2001 and 2007, GSK failed to include certain safety data about Avandia, a
diabetes drug.
The missing
information included data regarding certain post- marketing studies, as well as data regarding two studies undertaken in response to European regulators’ concerns about the cardiovascular safety of
Avandia. Since 2007, the FDA has added
two black box warnings to the Avandia label to alert physicians about the potential increased risk of (1)
congestive heart failure, and (2) myocardial
infarction (heart attack).
GSK has agreed to
plead guilty to failing to report data to the FDA and has agreed to pay a
criminal fine in the amount of $242,612,800 for its unlawful conduct concerning
Avandia.
It also includes
allegations that GSK paid kickbacks to health care professionals to induce them
to promote and prescribe these drugs as well as the drugs Imitrex, Lotronex,
Flovent and Valtrex. The United States alleges that this conduct caused false
claims to be submitted to federal health care programs.
GSK has agreed to pay
$1.043 billion relating to false claims arising from this alleged conduct. The federal share of this settlement is $832 million and the state share is $210 million.”
Comments
Post a Comment